March 10, 2015
Supporters of the Obama Administration, like Eric Yoffie
of the the Union for Reform Judaism, pretend to be angered and offended
by the “wildly inappropriate” action of PM Netanyahu in accepting the
invitation of the Speaker of the House to address Congress. They insist
that protocol was broken, that the speech was a an attack on the
President and that Netanyahu didn’t offer an alternative to Obama’s
policy. And they view the speech as unwanted interference in American
partisan politics.
All of these complaints are false, and one can only assume that, like
their president, they didn’t bother to listen to the speech. But the
part about “interference” makes me laugh. There is simply no comparison.
The US and Europe have been meddling in Israel’s affairs for years, and
have recently taken it to a new level. And they don’t do it openly, by
making speeches (indeed, Obama declined to speak to Israel’s Knesset in
2013, possibly because it would constitute recognition that Jerusalem is
our capital).
As we approach our March 17 election, the flow of foreign money into groups trying to defeat PM Netanyahu continues unabated. The V15 organization is assiduously working to get out the anti-Netanyahu vote, in the cities and Arab towns. And they are not the only foreign-backed organization
trying to influence the election against the PM. The Likud made a
complaint to the Election Commission against V15, but unfortunately they
shot from the hip and failed to establish a direct connection between
V15 and the PM’s electoral opponents.
This is nothing new. For years, the EU, individual European governments and the US-based New Israel Fund (NIF) have been funding non-governmental organizations in Israel which work against the interests of the state to the tune of millions of dollars.
These NGOs provided the raw material for the libelous accusations of
war crimes against Israel made by the UN Human Rights Commission in the
tendentious Goldstone Report about the 2008-9 Gaza War (since repudiated
by the jurist whose name it bears) and the forthcoming Schabas Report
about the more recent 2014 conflict.
The NGOs include some that engage in “lawfare” against Israel,
including legal attacks against IDF soldiers and commanders; others that
support boycott-divestment-sanctions (BDS); some that generate
propaganda to demonize the state and the IDF; and some that engage in
protests and vandalism in the territories.
It has recently been made public that the NIF received grants of more than $1 million from the US State Department
during the first Obama Administration. The NIF supports hundreds of
projects in Israel, ranging from relatively harmless ones like groups
favoring ‘religious pluralism’ to Israeli Arab organizations that want
to change Israel from a Jewish state to a binational state, to
supporters of BDS and anti-IDF troupes that travel the world accusing it
of war crimes.
But doesn’t Israel ‘meddle’ with US politics through the so-called ‘Israel Lobby’, in particular AIPAC?
Actually, no. AIPAC is an American organization, funded by pro-Israel
Americans. Whatever influence it has comes directly from the fact that
most Americans do support Israel, and members of Congress know this.
Contrast this with Arab lobbies that recycle petrodollars to try to
influence lawmakers, often in favor of policies that their constituents
oppose.
Well, they say, what about the nefarious Sheldon Adelson?
Adelson has given millions to the Birthright program, which brings
young Jewish Americans to Israel for ten days to see the country with
their own eyes. But he also is the major investor in the Israel Hayom
Newspaper, which infuriates the Left. So let’s look at Israel Hayom.
The argument is that since it is given away free, it isn’t a ‘real’
newspaper but just propaganda. But all newspapers make most of their
profit, if any, from the sale of advertising. And Israel Hayom has
plenty of ads. Free distribution of a newspaper to maximize circulation —
Israel Hayom now competes closely with Yediot Aharonot for the largest
circulation of any Israeli newspaper — is a legitimate business
strategy.
Adelson doesn’t hide his ownership, and Israel Hayom is the only
major newspaper that supports PM Netanyahu (Yediot and Ha’aretz in
particular are vehemently, even viciously, opposed to him). As the
Election Commission and Supreme Court recently decided when they turned
down a complaint against Israel Hayom from Netanyahu’s opponents, a
newspaper is entitled to an agenda — indeed it is impossible to imagine
one without a point of view.
I don’t (obviously) have a problem with Israel Hayom. I read it every
day. Indeed, Adelson, a private individual, is doing Israel a great
service by providing a vehicle for the presentation of a centrist point
of view, when other newspapers and TV and radio channels are all biased
to the left to a greater or lesser extent.
But I do have a problem with the US and European governments meddling
in Israel’s politics and attempting to influence its elections to
change our government to one which will be more compliant to their
interests — interests which often oppose the continued existence of
Israel as a Jewish state.
The left-wing politicians that think that they can accept the aid of
these governments and still maintain their independence are fooling
themselves. There will be a day when the US and Europe will call in
their chips (Kerry has already said that he will push for an agreement
with the Palestinians after the election). You don’t make a deal with
the devil and ask for your soul back.
Hands off my country!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.